My initial theory, is that for NGL to be an effective learning application, each course must include four elements:
- Experiential learning: Contextual, task-based learning.
- Controlled chaos: Providing clear expectations followed by freedom to achieve them.
- Expected connectivity: Creating some outcomes only achievable through external connections and networks.
- Multi-modal design: Resources, artefacts and tools catering to different levels of 21st century and learning preferences.
My scepticisms of NGL lie in its ‘perceived’ complexity, which I feel could be overwhelming for some learners. I’m concerned that those who aren’t completely au fait with technological literacy will find it difficult; those who like to learn independently may find it too ‘involved’ and those who cannot regulate will find it overwhelming. Each of these suppositions may result in a high degree of angst, which I assume is not conducive to genuine learning.
As such, I feel there should be some sort of prescription for designing NGL courses online, so that no learner is disadvantaged, but genuine learning is facilitated. At the moment I’m elbows-deep in literature from other theorists and commentators, so no doubt my ideas will diversify, however, I’m looking for some answers to these research questions:
- Does every learner need a deep understanding of web 2.0 functionality for NGL to be effective?
- What level of connectivism is too much for students who prefer to learn alone?
- Will the four design considerations above sufficiently ensure effective learning in an NGL course?
So....
Have you considered the challenges and stresses of NGL and whether or not they are universal?
Do you feel my queries are adequate, or will result in appropriate findings?
Do you have concerns with NGL that I may not have considered?
Please.
If you have any suggestions, respond in the comments section below and help me refine my theory.