Do we have any untended burning questions about NetGL?
Well……
Is there a specific learning theory for networked learning or a ‘most effective’ means of embracing it, or are we expected to simply let our networks take control?
Comparing that question to this course I can see that there has been some structure applied to the theory; there was an overview, confusion, information on knowledge management and filtering, then constant suggestions to branch out and explore. However, is that a universal practice or was it simply because this is a postgraduate degree and could not be approved without a certain level of configuration?
Way back when computer networks were being established, during the dawn of the digital information age, Castells (1996) claimed that networks constitute the new social morphology of our societies and the diffusion of networking logic substantially modifies the operation and outcomes in processes of production, experience, power and culture. And, that is very true.... especially if you don't like commas.
It seems too, that with connectivist theory that 'morphing' of the barriers between society and logic is systematically modifying the outcomes of education as well. But, is there a ‘best way’ to apply it?
Jones (2012) suggests there isn’t a ‘one size fits all’ approach and that due to the ‘slippery’ nature of learning and technology, many ‘best practices’ are required.
I tend to agree.
But, furthermore, David writes a post suggesting that everything in institutional e-learning is a model……. and it’s common for model builders to suffer from ‘expertise bias’. So, if that assumption reigns true with NetGL, who’s to say that the many models of it are really effective for each individual?
On the other hand, if they are good, how do you teach them all?
Al
Castells, M. (1996) The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture Volume 1. The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell
Jones, C. (2015). Networked Learning: An Educational Paradigm for the Age of Digital Networks. Springer.
Well……
Is there a specific learning theory for networked learning or a ‘most effective’ means of embracing it, or are we expected to simply let our networks take control?
Comparing that question to this course I can see that there has been some structure applied to the theory; there was an overview, confusion, information on knowledge management and filtering, then constant suggestions to branch out and explore. However, is that a universal practice or was it simply because this is a postgraduate degree and could not be approved without a certain level of configuration?
Way back when computer networks were being established, during the dawn of the digital information age, Castells (1996) claimed that networks constitute the new social morphology of our societies and the diffusion of networking logic substantially modifies the operation and outcomes in processes of production, experience, power and culture. And, that is very true.... especially if you don't like commas.
It seems too, that with connectivist theory that 'morphing' of the barriers between society and logic is systematically modifying the outcomes of education as well. But, is there a ‘best way’ to apply it?
Jones (2012) suggests there isn’t a ‘one size fits all’ approach and that due to the ‘slippery’ nature of learning and technology, many ‘best practices’ are required.
I tend to agree.
But, furthermore, David writes a post suggesting that everything in institutional e-learning is a model……. and it’s common for model builders to suffer from ‘expertise bias’. So, if that assumption reigns true with NetGL, who’s to say that the many models of it are really effective for each individual?
On the other hand, if they are good, how do you teach them all?
Al
Castells, M. (1996) The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture Volume 1. The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell
Jones, C. (2015). Networked Learning: An Educational Paradigm for the Age of Digital Networks. Springer.